Showing posts with label Chief Constable. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chief Constable. Show all posts

Friday, 16 August 2013

Police Commissioner's Report Clears Chief Constable

Commissioner Alan Hardwick, Independent (Lincolnshire Force Area), has been forced to accept the conclusions of a report he himself commissioned into allegations made against Temporary Chief Constable, Neil Rhodes.

In another misstep for Commissioner Hardwick a report, by the widely respected Chief Constable of Manchester Police, Sir Peter Fahy, has declared that allegations against Chief Constable Rhodes as "unsubstantiated".

Chief Constable Rhodes was suspended over his involvement in a dispute where he was accused of helping a former employee at West Yorkshire Police pursue a claim of racial discrimination which he knew to be contrived.

The report concluded there was no evidence to suggest that Neil Rhodes acted improperly in his role as a Chief Police Officers Staff Association "friend" to the employee. In the report Sir Peter said he had 'complete confidence' Chief Constable Rhodes acted 'from the best of motives' to try and 'achieve a reasonable compromise' He added:
"The investigation team conclude that Mr Rhodes did not exceed the intended boundaries or scope of a CPOSA friend as he properly understood them."
The report accepted there might have been a conflict of interest in some areas but also suggested more clarity is needed nationally, on the role of CPOSA friends.

In response to the report, Mr Hardwick said: 
"I had to take on a serious complaint that was made to me and the way I went around that, I believe, was the right way. I couldn't ignore it. 
"I remain troubled by the nature of the allegation and that it has not been possible for the investigating officer to determine exactly what happened in a private conversation between two highly regarded and credible professionals."
Commissioner Hardwick said the suspension had never been a personal issue and a judicial review had cost him £37,500, alone - questions are still to be answered about the cost to taxpayers about this sorry affair. Back in March Mr. Justice Stuart-Smith ruled that the Commissioner's decision was 'irrational' and 'perverse', determining that the Chief Constable's suspension was therefore unlawful. The judicial intervention was sparked when the Independent Police Complaints Commission were approach by Commissioner Hardwick to investigate and they determined that there was insufficient evidence for them to conduct an investigation.

 Following publication of Sir Peter's report, in a statement, Mr Rhodes said:
"I have sought over the last six months to maintain a dignified silence, safe in the knowledge that I knew there was never any substance in the spurious allegation. 
"The past few months have been unusually challenging. Following the judicial review decision, the commissioner and I resolved that we must draw a line beneath this matter, for the good of Lincolnshire, and demonstrate we could work together productively and positively."
Commissioner Hardwick had been Lincolnshire's Police and Crime Commissioner for just three months when he took the decision to suspend Neil Rhodes. The matter has attracted critics at Westminster, with the Chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, Keith Vaz MP, describing the way the chief constable's suspension was handled as a 'sorry state of affairs'. There have also been calls for Commisioner Hardwick to resign, amongst these local West Lindsey District Councillor, Cllr. Giles McNeill, Conservative (Nettleham Ward), who said:
"Commissioner Hardwick has once again been found wanting. First we had the refusal of the Independent Police Complaints Commission to investigate the matter then the Judge's ruling and now the investigation that he set up himself has found that the allegations were unsubstantiated.
 "It is hardly a surprise then that people are calling for the TV anchorman-come-Police Commissioner to resign. He has demonstrated again, clearly that he is not up to the job.
It is understood that Chief Constable Rhodes intends to apply for the post of permanent chief constable when it is advertised.

Thursday, 28 March 2013

Lincolnshire Police and Crime Commissioner Alan Hardwick should Resign Urges District Councillor

Cllr. Giles McNeill, Conservative (Nettleham Ward), has called on Police and Crime Commissioner Alan Harwick to resign following the humiliating ruling by a High Court Judge at a hearing in Manchester.

Mr. Justice Stuart-Smith said the the Commissioner's decision was 'irrational' and 'perverse', determining that the Chief Constable's suspension was therefore unlawful.

Cllr. McNeill said:
"It is clear that Alan Hardwick is not up to the job of being Police and Crime Commissioner. He has bungled this suspension of the Chief Constable, Neil Rhodes.
"It was clear that something was amiss when, having referred the matter to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, they decided that the matter was not sufficient for their investigation.
"The time has come for Commissioner Hardwick to do the honourable thing and resign."
Commissioner Hardwick, Independent (Lincolnshire Force Area), has appointed the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester to undertake an independent investigation.

Thursday, 24 May 2012

Chief Constable’s Speech to Nettleham Parish Council Meeting

Text of the speech by Chief Constable Neil Rhodes to Nettleham Parish Council Meeting held on Thursday, 24th May 2012 at Nettleham Village Hall, Brookfield Avenue.

"Mr Chairman, thank you very much for the opportunity to speak to the Parish Council and the residents of the village about the prospect of building an operational police station on our headquarters site here in Nettleham.

"I choose my words carefully, and say ‘prospect’ because for us this is not a done deal, but further development at the headquarters site is a strong option. We are very much here to listen, and look forward to a sensible and intelligent conversation with a community that in the past has always been strong supporters of the police.

"What we won’t be discussing in detail are alternative options we are or have considered, or commercially sensitive reports or costs. We are here to listen to your views on the viability and suitability of this site.

"So let me set out the issues for you as we see them. Lincoln police station, at West Parade, serves the city and the wider West Lindsey area, supplemented by a number of smaller stations, probably the largest being at Gainsborough. Officers working from there include roads policing teams and several other teams that serve the wider area – and yes, including 22 busy cells.

"The building is old, tired, expensive to run and needs a lot of money spending on it. It's far too big for us now and chunks of it stand empty. The location is poor. It's okay for town centre foot patrol, but vehicle access is really difficult - it's a really choked up spot. It's not a friendly place for the public.

"We need to separate out, the town centre team and cars and put them in a far more publicly friendly place, right in the heart of the town centre, preferably shared with other agencies, accessible to the public.

"We need all of the back office support, booking on and office facilities, interview teams, custody facilities, traffic teams etc to be in a good strategic location, within a modern, sustainable, economical building. We have explored alternatives. With a very tight budget you can understand why developing an existing police base, that's 60 seconds from the bypass and on the main A46 arterial road really seems to fit. A base that has a lot of land, that we own, and which is already connected to the police IT infrastructure we need.

"With any planning application there are many issues, the site, the appearance, traffic flows, changes of existing use. In this case the one consistent message we are hearing from residents focuses on the handling of prisoners and the potential release of prisoners on the edge of a beautiful, tranquil village that is a very low crime area indeed. Many of you came here just for that reason. I can understand those concerns and that they are genuinely held. You will get no accusation of NIMBYism from me.

"In addition, you have raised concerns with us in relation to the viability of a build in the preferred position on site, as it is the location of an old quarry, and also raised concerns about footpaths needing to be redirected. We are looking into both of those issues, but should either prove a real problem, this is a very large site and the building could be accommodated readily in an alternative location on it.

"When dealing with your concerns what I hope to do is try to offer some measure of reassurance, reaffirm we are listening and that this is not already decided.

"Of prisoners released, what is their motivation to visit and cause trouble in the local housing estate? Most just want to get home ASAP. Existing facilities service not only Lincoln but the whole of West Lindsey. We have a duty of care to people we arrest; we don't just turf them out miles from home, with no transport or means of getting back. Family and friends collect, solicitors help, interviewing officers returning to their area help. That's just business as usual for us. In addition, in this case, we have built in transport arrangements that will see prisoners taken and released back at Lincoln bus and rail stations where that is sensible and appropriate.

"I'm sure someone will point out that once you've finished your investigation and charged a person you have to bail and release them. You can't just keep them for another couple of hours until transport is available. Quite right. But if we think they are likely to cause problems and commit offences in the immediate area on release, that's grounds to detain or impose stringent bail conditions. The proportion of people, backed by their solicitor, insisting on immediate release, whose transport arrangements we are not happy with and who have the intention to offend immediately in the Nettleham village, well you work it out for yourself - it has to be very low indeed.

"Bail backs (people who are arrested and later have to return to a police station) that will be dealt with at HQ site, most will have driven there and will drive away. Many now will be dealt with offsite or by postal charging. BUT, transport back to Lincoln centre is there for them too.

"So, in summary, there is a need to replace the main police station that serves this area, Lincoln and wider West Lindsey. It needs to be in a good strategic location for that area, not land-locked in town. We have an existing police site at Nettleham that fits the requirement and which we already own. It has to be a strong option on cost alone. We are exploring the viability of planning consent. We are talking with and more importantly listening to local residents. In due course we'll make a full report to the Police Authority, who will debate the matter in public, and who will also listen to your views, before they decide, balancing the whole case for the good of the wider area, what course to pursue.

"In the meantime, this meeting is neither the start to our conversation with residents, we have had two open days in the village hall already, nor is it the end. We want to discuss this further. I know there is a really strong and well organised group calling themselves SOLVE who fiercely oppose this development. I met last week with one person from that group and I would like to talk more. We are open minded, prepared to listen to argument and evidence, I'd like to think you are too. The offer is open and genuine.

"Thank you for listening.  Mr Chairman, thank you for this opportunity to speak."